ONLINE PETITION TO END PREJUDICE IN PUBLISHING

We the undersigned, demand that South Africa’s publishing industry, in particular, Naspers/Media24 and its affiliates such as “Die Burger” put an end to prejudice in publishing and that media companies stop discriminating against employees, clients and the public on the basis of faith, class, colour and creed.

Furthermore we demand that Naspers/Media24 and its affiliates, such as Via Afrika, Paarl Media & Educor carry a “Racism, Sexism and Prejudice-Free” sticker on products until such time as all discrimination is done away with.

In addition, the group’s community newspapers such as Metroburger and People’s Post, should reflect the views of the community and not the racist ideology and apartheid editorials of the past.

PUT AN END TO PREJUDICE IN PUBLISHING

STOP MEDIA APARTHEID

NO TO RACIST AND SEXIST “BAASKAP” IN THE WORKPLACE

SIGN THE PETITION

[Clicking on the above will take you to a page where you can join a global petition against prejudice in publishing]

CLICK HERE FOR UPDATES ON RECENT EVENTS THAT OCCURRED AT NASPERS/MEDIA24

FW DE KLERK: Will he renounce Nuclear Power before he dies?

AS THE time rapidly draws near when we will lose De Klerk and other SA nobel laureates, will the man who crossed the Rubicon and dismantled South Africa’s nuclear weapons programme renounce atomic power in toto? Will FW finally kick his 50 cigeratte a day, Koeberg habit?

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Safrica/SABuildingBombs.html

Perhaps readers will remember that while nuclear war is a probablity in the Middle East, we need to be doing everything in our capacity to avoid the proliferation of weapons on the sub-continent, putting an end, once and for all, to costly atomic energy programmes such as the PBMR and shutting down Koeberg along with its money-grabbing quasi-national developers from the United Kingdom and elsewhere.

Perhaps De Klerk and his party, the ANC will put their money and their conscience where their mouthes are and set up a foundation against nuclear proliferation/atomic energy and finally end the so-called “peaceful use of atomic power”? Or would a donation to the cancer foundation be a lot more meaningfull than exposing uranium miners and PBMR workers to one X-Ray per day for the next fifty years?

http://www.news24.com/News24/South_Africa/News/0,,2-7-1442_1946171,00.html

FORWARD TO A NON-RACIST, NON-SEXIST, NUCLEAR-FREE CONTINENT

NO SAFE DOSE OF RADIATION — SAY NO TO ATOMIC WAR

HAND OF FATIMA: Connection with Judaism?

Hamesh Hand or Hand of Hamsa
Hamesh Hand or Hand of Khamsa

This posting has aroused a lot of interest around the world and now gets about 500 hits every day. Perhaps it is the magic of the iconography involved, or the idea that the male principle of the Hamesh Hand, has a feminine equal in the Hand of Fatima?

Here is the text from my original posting. I have updated the links and images which disappeared for some reason:

“I’ve also seen one in an Orthodox Jewish Home, with a “Chai” this symbol, commonly seen on necklaces and other jewelry and ornaments, is simply the Hebrew word Chai (living), with the two Hebrew letters Chet and Yod attached to each other. Some say it refers to the Living G-d. Judaism as a religion is very focused on life, and the word chai has great significance. The typical Jewish toast is l’chayim (to life). Gifts to charity are routinely given in multiples of 18 (the numeric value of the word Chai).

According to a Wikipedia entry, “the hamesh hand or hamsa hand is a popular motif in Jewish jewelry. Go into any Jewish gift shop and you will find necklaces and bracelets bearing this inverted hand with thumb and pinky pointing outward. The design commonly has an eye in the center of the hand or various Jewish letters in the middle.”

“There is nothing exclusively Jewish about the hamesh hand. Arab cultures often refer to it as the Hand of Fatima, which represents the Hand of G-d. Similar designs are common in many cultures. Why it has become such a popular symbol among Jews? I haven’t been able to find an adequate explanation anywhere. My best guess: in many cultures, this hand pattern represents a protection against the evil eye, and the evil eye has historically been a popular superstition among Jews.

Hand of Fatima exhibition by Farideh Zariv

In June 2006 Iranian artist Farideh Zariv  held an exhibition in Cape Town’s Bo Kaap, a predominantly Muslim district of Cape Town.

This is taken from one of the leaflets of the show: “The Hand of Fatima, an ancient motif in northern Africa and Middle Eastern art and architecture, is rich in meaning. The symbol is also known as khamsa and the Eye of Fatima in Islamic tradition. The Hand of Fatima symbolises divine protection, freedom and peaceful co-existence with others and is used, for example, as amulets, jewelery and architectural features. Although predating Islam, the symbol has been widely assimilated into Islamic art and popular culture.

The Iranian-Australian artist, Farideh Zariv bought her first piece of Hand of Fatima in 1990. Her collection have grown to more than eighty pieces and have been collected from Iran, all over the Arabian world and India. Selected pieces will be on display. On display will also be multi-media artworks by Zariv that were inspired by the Hand of Fatima. According to Zariv, ‘-each hand has a message for humankind. The hand of Fatima is a symbol of that message, carrying spiritual and mystical meanings. This hand could be a hand of light, showing humankind the way to brightness and peace. It could also be a hand, which directs human attention to inner spirituality. In my art I try to convey this message including the essence of the hand in the title of each work.’


Karoo towns set to make a bomb

The Headline of this article speaks for itself, but the content is misleading. Instead of referring to uranium and nuclear power as the answer to global warming, the reporter would do well to research the link between uranium mining and cancer, as well as the negative impact of atomic energy, in terms of war capacity and increase in overall radiation exposure. DRL

Karoo towns set to make a bomb

May 28 2006 at 04:56PM

By Nicky Blatch

The Karoo is believed to hold millions of tons of uranium worth hundreds of billions of rand which could be exploited as the world turns increasingly to nuclear power because of global warming.

Thirty years ago, the discovery of uranium in the heart of the Karoo sent prospectors flocking to towns near the border of the Eastern and Western Cape, from Aberdeen to Beaufort West, and further north and west.

But a drop in the price of uranium in the 1980s left the mineral untouched for decades, until now.

An increasing demand for energy on a global scale has led to steadily rising prices, bringing prospectors back – some of whom have paid out millions to farmers for mineral rights to their properties.

Click Here to visit South Africa’s no.1 Online Casino!

Countries are converting from generating electricity with fossil fuels such as coal which cause global warming, to building nuclear power stations which do not emit greenhouse gases.

The Karoo prospectors are now waiting for their prospecting rights to be issued by the government, before the explorations can begin in earnest and the exact extent and worth of the uranium can be determined.

But researchers estimate there are several million tons of uranium in the area. At the current price of about R620 a kilogram, one ton of uranium would fetch almost R620 000, and a million tons a whopping R620-billion, meaning that both the prospectors and the townspeople could be sitting on a colossal fortune.

Beaufort West property developer Derick Welgemoed, a former municipal manager, is already planning ahead for the predicted boom that uranium will bring to the town by building Beaufort West’s first townhouse complex, and there are plenty of other developments in the pipeline.

“Uranium is going to turn the economy of the town upside down,” said Welgemoed, who was administrative head of the town until this year’s local elections.

The Ngondo family, from Beaufort West’s Mandlenkosi township, last year landed a R20m windfall when they sold the mineral rights on the farm Katdoringkuil to London-based mining company Uranco Incorporated.

The family bought the stony, semi-desert 6 000ha farm near the town in 2001 with a state subsidy and a loan of half a million rands.

They were paid R14-million up front, and will receive three subsequent payments of R2-million each, plus a four percent annual royalty once mining starts.

They sold their mineral rights just in time, for in May 2004, the new Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act transferred all unused “old order” mineral rights from landowners to the state, in line with international mineral rights precedents.

But the staggered implementation of the new legislation allowed the Ngondo family a year’s grace within which to apply to the state to sell their mineral rights.

In terms of the Act, all mineral rights belong to the state and owners have to apply for mining rights or licences. The final phase comes into effect in 2009.

Exploration by mining companies in the late 1970s and early 1980s stopped when the price of uranium fell from around R570/kg to about R100/kg, meaning uranium mining was no longer economically viable. The price is now about R620/kg and rising.

Minerals and energy departmental spokesperson Malebo Mahape said prospecting rights had so far only been issued to one company, Midnight Masquerade, for a small portion of the farm Rystkuil. The other applications were still being processed.

Garth Abrahamse, spokes-man for Midnight Masquerade, which has since changed its name to Beaufort West Minerals, said the company would not start prospecting until its other submitted applications had been approved.

Abrahamse said: “Studies have shown this is a well-known area for uranium. But we will only be able to tell where it is, and how much there is, once we start prospecting.”

Neal Froneman, chief executive of SXR Uranium One, which has also applied for prospecting rights in the area, said it was “too early to give an authoritative estimate” of the worth of the uranium in the area.

Johan Loock, honorary researcher in the University of the Free State’s geology department, has been involved with uranium studies in the area for about 14 years.

He said trial mines were set up in the 1970s at the farms Rystkuil and Rietkuil, near Beaufort West.

“They mined a couple of thousand tons and sent them overseas to be processed, to see if uranium could be extracted.

“But in the early 1980s the uranium price dropped and all the companies pulled out, and nothing further happened.”

That is, until the 1990s, when the Atomic Energy Corporation (now the Nuclear Energy Corporation of SA), contracted universities including Free State University to conduct collaborative research.

“The AEC forecast that the price of uranium would increase by the end of the century, because the US had stopped mining it in the 1980s and 90s, and the world would start running out of uranium.
Right now, China, Korea, Japan and Taiwan are desperate for energy. They are already building 30 nuclear power stations and planning 20 more. Since 2004,” Loock said “there’s been a renewed interest in the Beaufort West area, many companies are busy there.

But, he said, everything was now “on hold” as companies awaited their prospecting permits.

KOEBERG: No safe dose of radiation

THERE simply is no safe dose of radiation and the nuclear industry is lying to us, that’s the gist of the argument made by various members of Koeberg Alert, including myself. As the Navajo Nation have said: The Nuclear Industry is bad medicine. No doubt, locals will learn that radiation is bad muti and that no safe dose exists, despite what some nuclear engineers and physicists, John Walmsely included, would like us to believe.

Take something as sane and simple as x-rays.Would you subject your child to the equivelent of one x-ray per day? Would you give yourself a brain-scan every weekend? Would you put your head in a microwave oven? The bullshit that we take for science today is alarming to say the least. Add lots of money, some push-and-pull of big bloated government and you have a recipe for an African Chernobyl, as South Africans start to electrocute themselves with radioactive kettles and we get no further in the debate about renewables.

Once again, top of the list of a safe, renewable, energy supply, is Kinetic Wave Energy from the Sea. Next up, Hydrogen Fuel Cells, that breakdown H and O2 into harmless water. Third, simply because it represents a vast ocean of untapped energy is the earths on geothermal potential, waiting to be tapped by the mining and drilling sectors. All one needs to do is pump a conductive gas down into the earth, until it heats up sufficiently, expands, and shoots up, driving either a turbine or some other system of energy exchange.

Shell have launched a solar energy programme, and BP is looking beyond petroleum, and yet ESKOM can’t get off the military arms dealer’s lists of whose-who in the mindless atomic bomb trade. While Manual spends sleepless nights cooking up the next budget, that will give arms dealers billions of tax-payers money, people starve and Alec Erwin plays around with a PBMR white elephant that refuses to die. Come-on, boys give us something better than cheap lies about asbestos siding and mercury in our water supply being good for us — or why not drink some toxic waste or eat some lead cadmium to prove how safe this stuff really is.

WOULD YOU TRUST A NUCLEAR ENGINEER TO LOOK AFTER YOUR CHILDREN?

WOULD YOU LET HOMER SIMPSON RUN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY?

FORWARD TO A NON-RACIST, NON-SEXIST, NUCLEAR-FREE CONTINENT

Hummers and the Big Mac

YET another example of the schizofrenic development path we are choosing as a nation – apparently the South Africa auto industry is all set to build those gas-guzzling, HUMMERS. Symbol of American stupidity and the real cause behind the Iraq War. Estimates are you need to invade at least one foreign nation a year, just to keep the metal beast in fuel for what is probably the most inefficient machine ever designed by a human being.

No wonder Mbeki is considered the lapdog of Shell in Ogoniland and other parts of the Big Mac Empire. News just out, the entire world will run out of fuel sometime in 2010 as our one person-per-car policy creates global instablity.

BILL OF RIGHTS ONLINE VIGIL — Long Live “We The People”, Ten Years on

SOUTH AFRICA is only the second country in the world to adopt the preamble to the declaration of human rights, that goes “We the People…” thus setting as apart from other states that use God or Athiesm, to define their creation. Fundemental to this democratic tradition is the belief in secular humanism and the seperation of Church and State.

Unfortunately the so-called Anti-Terrorism Act aka the Protection of Constitutional Democracy against Terrorism and Related Activities Act (ProConDTRA), makes no allowence for the protection of our Bill of Rights against politicians, judges and lawyers — those who would dilute freedom to the status of a tampon-advert.

Then there’s RICA the Regulation of Interception of Communications Act, forcing mobile companies to install snoopware and allowing government spooks to tap into cellphone conversations at will. Our right to privacy is enshrined in article 14 — “Everyone has the right to privacy, which includes the right not to have ­the privacy of their communications infringed.” No longer applicable?

Then there’s FICA — Financial Intelligence Centre Act that not only makes it harder for druglords to launder money, but also makes it easier for organised crime and big business cartels to locate and harass ordinary citizens, who may be blackmailed or forced into protection rackets etc. Section 14 of our Bill of Rights no longer applies.

Do you trust the people storing information that they are not going to snoop without the authorisation of a judge? Do you trust politicians to protect our rights? Do you trust anybodies word on freedom? Rights are not privileges that can get taken away. But if we are not vigilent, we will forget that we ever had rights to begin with.

Anyone interesting in joining an ONLINE VIGIL for our Bill of Rights, whose 10th anniversary hasn’t been noticed by a nation caught up in the Zuma Saga, post comments below. Maybe somebody will put up a web-page or two?

South Africa’s Freedom — The Bill of Rights — ten years on…and nothing but rules.

ITS BEEN ten years since the enactment of our Bill of Rights enshrining freedoms such as speech, political association and the right to think, but sadly, little is being done to celebrate South Africa’s crowning achievement. Political parties hate the constitution, judges claim more than their fair share of freedom, and ordinary citizens are left shackled to new laws that erode fundemental rights, like the right to privacy and dissent.

Is South Africa a nation that is free in word only? Are we slaves to parliament and career politicians that have done absolutely nothing to protect civil liberties? In another ten years, we won’t even remember that we had freedom, and in twenty rights will be quaint artifacts, polite nick nacks that we like to keep around to remember the days when we fought for human rights and believed in democracy.

Come on bloggers, I expected a lot more than blank verse and emoticons that wink but never say anything important.

Anybody out there remember Cyril Ramaphosa? The historical legislature and assembly that brought the world’s second national constititution to include “We the People…”

NUKES: Australia’s anti-nuclear precedent

It is easy to forget that South Africa was once the only country in the world to willingly give up its nuclear status. (Remember FW de Klerk came out as the good guy after decades of nuclear cronyism). All of this could change if we lose the looming battle against PBMRs and Mini-Koeberg.

So where do we stand? Australia’s New South Wales, passed a law in 1986 banning the construction of nuclear reactors such as those contemplated under South Africa’s nuclear programme adopted by an over-zealous Alec Erwin.

The URANIUM MINING AND NUCLEAR FACILITIES (PROHIBITIONS) ACT 1986 – SECT 8 prohibits the construction and operation of “(d) a nuclear reactor, whether or not designed for the purpose of generating electricity,” and is similar in scope to tribal laws passed by the Navajo Nation in the states of Utah , Arizona and New Mexico.

An intriguing possibility is that regional authorities in South Africa might one day, pass similar laws. Acting on a municipal and local level, South Africans could end the new Cold War and its double-lie of peaceful nuclear energy. Atomic weapons are just the tip of an iceberg that is based upon programmes such as our own PBMR.

As the only nation in the world to willingly relinquish nuclear bombs in exchange for peace, we need to keep our country clean of atomic energy, regardless of the consequences to our development. Why turn back the clock and destroy our progressive record? There are alternatives to war and costly nuclear plants. Renewable energy systems that utilise wind, wave and geothermal energy are available.

FORWARD TO A NUCLEAR-FREE, NON-RACIST and NON-SEXIST CONTINENT

HIV STATS: Latest figures could contradict claims of national pandemic

CONTRARY to some outrageous figures doing the rounds that one in four South African’s is HIV positive, (call them urban legends if you will), the prevelance of HIV is a lot lower than the scare stories presume. According to the Nelson-Mandela/HSRC study, HIV prevalance is closer to one in ten, or roughly 10.8 percent of the population.

Still alarming and no reason to be any less vigilent. Compared to some of the strange figures emerging from the daily press (some TAC members claim 60% of South Africans are HIV positive) this politically-incorrect interpretation, provides a rather sobering and, I guess refreshing perspective. But it all depends upon how one views the world — either from a half-a-tipple empty or half-a-beer-glass full perspective?

The latest stats have been published by none other than the TAC’s own Equal Treatment journal (March 2006) taken from a study conducted by the HSRC in 2005, which updates (and diminishes) earlier figures of a 11.4% prevelance (South African’s over the age of two with HIV) done in 2002.

All a long way off from end-of-the-worldism, doom and gloom, we’re all going to die from the bug or be forced to marry young virgins, school of behaviour modification?